(This is a reaction essay to the article ‘The
Intellectual Bankruptcy of UP Activism’ that is already published last October)
Winnie
Monsod, a professor emeritus in the university, criticized them as hooligans
and they criticized how intimidating “bearers of contrary and
unfashionable ideas” can only result “in an impoverishment of intellectual life
and a reduction of debate to a monologue among the already-converted.” Thus did
they articulate a deeper assault on the very essence of a UP “where debates are
won … not by shouting down but by speaking up.” (c) Oscar Franklin Tan.
I agree to Mr. Tan,
the writer of the article. Not every matters and propositions can be won by
shouting what you feel about the topic. It also removes the concept UP have
according to Ms. Monsod, debates win and not shouting down. I personally
believe that activists today left marks on those who see them fighting for what
is right. This mark is the mark of discrimination that activists are these
negative elements of the society and are very rebellious. They made this
concept of activism because of the outlook of the activists themselves; they
are closing doors for hope and solution by the locks of revolution and
pessimism.
I think noisy
activism for UP and PUP ruins the status of the said universities, because this
two are the homes of the scholars of the country. Scholars are intelligent,
educated, and smart, and I think this shouting situations negates to what a
scholar should look like. “Ang taong sumisigaw o sinisigaw ang himutok ay isang
makitid na tao.” An open-minded person never shouts because he/she knows that
everything is solved through good communication between parties. It is time
that activists change clothes and start wearing more decent outfit, the outfit
of order and speaking up.
No comments:
Post a Comment